日期:2026/01/12 IAE
慈善經濟主義新論（三）
誰偷走你寶貴的生命？！
——從「自利價格」到「利他價格」的經濟學典範轉移
作者｜陳俊吉（Frank Chen）
GCWPA 創辦人｜GCWPA 智庫｜IAE Global
New Theory of Charity Economicism (III)
Who Has Stolen Your Precious Life?
From Self-Interest Pricing to Altruistic Pricing: A Paradigm Shift in Economics
Author｜Frank Chen
Founder of GCWPA｜GCWPA Think Tank｜IAE Global
一、問題起點：價格是否真為中立？
I. The Starting Question: Is Price Truly Neutral?
中
在主流經濟學中，價格被視為中立、理性且有效率的市場訊號。然而，慈善經濟主義首先指出：價格從來不是中立的。價格要嘛服務自利，要嘛承擔利他。
EN
In mainstream economics, price is treated as a neutral, rational, and efficient market signal. Charity Economicism challenges this assumption by asserting that price is never neutral—it either serves self-interest or bears altruistic responsibility.
二、資本主義價格理論：自利的「隱形之手」
II. Capitalist Pricing Theory: The Self-Interest “Invisible Hand”
中
在資本主義理論中，價格被視為一隻自利的隱形之手，市場均衡成交量被簡化為：
Q=F(P,other factors constant)
在此框架下，價格僅反映私人成本與供需關係，社會成本（SC）被系統性排除。
EN
In capitalist theory, price functions as a self-interest-driven “invisible hand.” Market equilibrium quantity is simplified as:
Q=F(P,other factors constant)
Within this framework, price reflects only private costs and supply–demand relations, while social costs (SC) are systematically excluded.
三、慈善經濟主義的轉向：價格成為「有形之手」
III. Charity Economicism: Price as a “Visible Hand”
中
慈善經濟主義提出根本轉向：
價格不應只是隱形的自利之手，而必須成為利他的「有形之手」。
因此，「慈善價格理論」主張價格必須納入社會成本，以避免資源配置對文明造成扭曲。
EN
Charity Economicism introduces a fundamental shift:
Price should not remain an invisible hand of self-interest but become a visible hand of altruistic responsibility.
Thus, Charity Pricing Theory requires prices to internalize social costs in order to prevent civilizational distortion in resource allocation.
四、社會成本（SC）為何不可忽略
IV. Why Social Cost (SC) Must Be Internalized
中
若價格未反映社會成本，將產生「表面效率、實質傷害」的結果：
私人成本最小化，卻導致社會成本最大化。
EN
When prices fail to reflect social costs, the result is apparent efficiency with substantive harm: private costs are minimized while social costs are maximized.
只有內部化社會成本，資源配置才是真正最適。
Only by internalizing social costs can resource allocation be truly optimal.
五、對完全競爭理論最適規模的根本質疑
V. Fundamental Critique of the “Optimal Scale” in Perfect Competition
中
傳統完全競爭理論假設最適效率建立於下列均衡條件：
SMR=SMC=LMR=LMC=LAC=SAC=SAVC=LAVC
其目的在於追求短期與長期最低成本之社會產出均衡量。
EN
Traditional perfect competition theory assumes optimal efficiency under the following equilibrium condition:
SMR=SMC=LMR=LMC=LAC=SAC=SAVC=LAVC
The objective is to achieve socially optimal output at minimum short- and long-run costs.
六、被隱藏的前提：社會成本被視為零
VI. The Hidden Assumption: Social Cost Equals Zero
中
在上述模型中，社會與環境成本被隱含假設為不存在或為零。
實務上，資本家所支付的社會成本等於零。
EN
Within this model, social and environmental costs are implicitly assumed to be nonexistent or zero.
In practice, the social cost paid by capital owners equals zero.
七、百年經濟學對文明的後果
VII. Civilizational Consequences of a Century of Economic Doctrine
中
此一百年西方經濟概念，已深刻塑造無限自利的行為模式，導致：
EN
This century-long Western economic doctrine has deeply shaped patterns of unlimited self-interest, resulting in:
-
Rapid environmental degradation
-
Public health deterioration
-
Sustainability reduced to rhetoric
八、慈善價格理論的文明意義
VIII. The Civilizational Meaning of Charity Pricing
中
慈善經濟主義主張：
若價格不承擔社會成本，任何效率都是對文明的扭曲。
價格、效率與經濟理論，必須同時回應生命、環境與世代責任。
EN
Charity Economicism asserts:
If prices do not bear social costs, all efficiency becomes a distortion of civilization.
Price, efficiency, and economic theory must simultaneously respond to life, environment, and intergenerational responsibility.
九、章節結論
IX. Chapter Conclusion (Canonical Statement)
中
資本主義的價格是一隻隱形的手；
慈善經濟主義的價格，必須成為
看得見生命與社會成本的有形之手。
EN
Capitalist pricing is an invisible hand;
Charity Economicism demands a visible hand that recognizes life and social costs.